TrackCompare
Contact Us:
0845 299 6555
 
 
Customer Login
 

GPS Vehicle Tracking System Used In Speeding Court Case

Author:
Category:
TrackCompare, November 12, 2009
Navman Wireless, Vehicle Tracking
Commercial Vehicle Tracking
Why vehicle tracking makes commercial sense.
Vehicle Fleet Tracking
How vehicle tracking benefits larger fleets.
Tracking Systems - FAQs
Frequently asked tracking questions, answered.
Tracking Systems – 10 Reasons to Buy
10 good reasons to invest in vehicle tracking.
Benefits of Tracking Systems
How tracking systems can benefit your business
Free Tracking ROI Calculator
How much can vehicle tracking save your fleet?
Lone Worker Protection
Upgrade your system and save up to 20%.
Tracking Systems – Tools
3 tools to help you find the best tracking solution.

Yet another cost saving benefit of GPS vehicle tracking systems has emerged thanks to an expert witness statement by Barry Neill IT director of Navman Wireless. His evidence enabled a successful challenge to be made in a speeding ticket case.

Van driver Gareth Powell disputed an accusation that he was clocked by a police speed gun on the A4174 near Bristol on 28th November 2008, travelling at 61mph in 50mph zone. Powell maintained he was travelling at less than 50mph and felt positive he had not exceeded the limit, so he sought the help of Navman Wireless who were able to prove from their vehicle tracking records that he never exceeded 48mph.

The Judge at Bath and Wansdyke Magistrates Court on 30th October 2009 dismissed the case, having accepted as evidence the advice from Navman Wireless that under good conditions, (which were prevalent on the day ) GPS tracking technology is accurate to within three metres.

Having a GPS vehicle tracking device installed saved this driver from having to pay a hefty fine, a possible six points on his licence and increased insurance costs for his company. The potential will not be lost on any company, small or large, which has been forced to accept false readings from radar guns and pay the penalty unfairly.

 
How helpful was this page?
1 out of 52 out of 53 out of 54 out of 55 out of 5 (2 Votes, Score: 5.00)
Loading ... Loading ...

User Comments:

  1. From: Ewan Black

    Unless things have changed very recently, it is my understanding that Navman systems do not record vehicle positions on a second by second basis, but rather at minimum intervals of at least 1 minute. On this basis it would appear that the judge has been hoodwinked into giving an incorrect decision, as if a position is recorded at minute intervals, the best that can be obtained under any circumstances would be an average speed over that 1 minute period, which could of course be 48mph. This does not necessarily mean that the driver did not drive at the speed the police have claimed, and then reduced his speed accordingly to give an overall average for the 1 minute of 48mph. Naughty!!!!!


Click Here To Share Your Comments

Name: *
Email: *
Website:




Bookmark and Share

 
 
Get an Exclusive Deal on TomTom
vehicle tracking only through TrackCompare.
The Greener Tracking Solution for
Safer and more Economical Driving
 

Home | Contact | About Us | Terms & Conditions | Privacy

 

©2009 www.TrackCompare.co.uk